The Red Green Show “Twinning” Episode A Model of Cooperation

I just read Dr. H. Steven Moffic’s post on Psychiatric Times, “The Space Station as a Model for Intercultural Cooperation.”  I also read the blog of another psychiatric I consider a colleague and friend, Dr. George Dawson, MD, and it’s sort of in the oppositive vein, being about the recent snafu of some Republican Minnesota legislators deciding to submit a bill to the legislature mansplaining Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) to the Democrats why TDS needs to become a law. It’s going over like a lead space station.

Incidentally, one legislature activity tracking website (Bill Track 50) has an Artificial Intelligence (AI) summary of the bill which says in part, “…the bill appears to be satirical or politically motivated…”

And the Minnesota Senate Minority Leader, Mark T. Johnson, said the bill was “a little bit tongue in cheek,” and possibly unintentionally joked that “Senate Republicans have always supported mental health funding…” while also calling attention to problems that the two political parties have cooperating with each other (story source WCCO News Minnesota, “Minnesota bill to define “Trump derangement syndrome” as mental illness provokes backlash” by Eric Henderson, Caroline Cummings; accessed March 18, 2025). Obviously these two pieces present opposites when it comes to collaboration.

The other issue pertinent to my post today has been the recent tariff and trade war going on between Canada and America, which is all about competition rather than cooperation.

Therefore, I did a web search for any Red Green Show episodes that demonstrated cooperation as a theme. In fact, the usual AI guidance (which I never ask for) pointed out that The Red Green Show didn’t present episodes about cooperation per se, but satirized the topic. For once, I had to agree with AI for the most part.

On the other hand, I did find a Red Green Show episode called “Twinning” that actually seemed to involve collaboration between Canada and Iowa, if you can imagine that nowadays. Back in the year 2000, The Red Green Show sponsored a survey of all 50 states in America, offering an opportunity for persons from an American city to twin with persons from Canada, I think it was Ontario. This meant that Americans would visit Canada and Canadians would visit America. I may not have the exact details right, but the idea of cross-cultural collaboration and getting to know each other was the main idea.

The whole state of Iowa endorsed the twinning offer with The Red Green Show, which of course, represented Canada. At the time, the Iowa Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) network was supporting the Red Green Show.

 I never knew about that when it happened in 2000, probably because I was pretty busy working as a consultation-liaison psychiatrist here in Iowa City, Iowa. Anyway, the “Twinning” episode was one of the funniest I’ve seen. You know, identical twins are not exactly identical in every way.

Wonderful Windy Day

Well, the forecast was for a very windy day, more windy than we’d like. On the other hand, it was bearable on the Terry Trueblood Trail. However, the forecast is for high winds and hail and we’re not looking forward to that.

The highlight was seeing a leucistic Canadian Goose for the first time. They’re rare. It’s a color variation. The one we saw had a brownish head and white feathers on its body.

It was a great day for bird watching.

Rounding@Iowa Podcast: “Advances in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer”

This episode of Rounding@Iowa is about important medical advances in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. As you listen to Dr. Clancy interview Dr. Joseph Cullen about what’s new, you’ll hear a lot about high-dose intravenous Vitamin C. This can enhance treatment and improve response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Dr. Cullen’s most recent study about this technique showed the overall survival of patients with late-stage pancreatic cancer increased from 8 months to 16 months.

89: Tick-borne Illnesses Rounding@IOWA

Join Dr. Clancy, Dr. Appenheimer & Dr. Barker as they discuss prevention, diagnosis and treatment of various tick-borne illnesses.  CME Credit Available:  https://uiowa.cloud-cme.com/course/courseoverview?eid=82296   Host: Gerard Clancy, MD Senior Associate Dean for External Affairs Professor of Psychiatry and Emergency Medicine University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Guests: Ben Appenheimer, MD Clinical Associate Professor of Internal Medicine-Infectious Diseases Assistant Director, Infectious Diseases Fellowship Program Associate Clinical Director, Infectious Diseases Co-Medical Director, TelePrEP, University of Iowa Health Care University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Jason Barker, MD Associate Professor of Internal Medicine-Infectious Diseases University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Financial Disclosures:  Dr. Gerard Clancy, his guests, and Rounding@IOWA planning committee members have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Nurse: The University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine designates this activity for a maximum of 1.0 ANCC contact hour. Pharmacist and Pharmacy Tech: The University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine designates this knowledge-based activity for a maximum of 1.0 ACPE contact hours. Credit will be uploaded to the NABP CPE Monitor within 60 days after the activity completion. Pharmacists must provide their NABP ID and DOB (MMDD) to receive credit. JA0000310-0000-26-038-H01 Physician: The University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Other Health Care Providers: A certificate of completion will be available after successful completion of the course. (It is the responsibility of licensees to determine if this continuing education activity meets the requirements of their professional licensure board.)  
  1. 89: Tick-borne Illnesses
  2. 88: Modifiable Risk Factors for Breast Cancer
  3. 87: New Treatment Options for Menopause
  4. 86: Cancer Rates in Iowa
  5. 85: Solutions for Rural Health Workforce Shortages

Reference:

Kellie L. Bodeker, Brian J. Smith, Daniel J. Berg, Chandrikha Chandrasekharan, Saima Sharif, Naomi Fei, Sandy Vollstedt, Heather Brown, Meghan Chandler, Amanda Lorack, Stacy McMichael, Jared Wulfekuhle, Brett A. Wagner, Garry R. Buettner, Bryan G. Allen, Joseph M. Caster, Barbara Dion, Mandana Kamgar, John M. Buatti, Joseph J. Cullen,

A randomized trial of pharmacological ascorbate, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer,

Redox Biology,

Volume 77,

2024,

103375,

ISSN 2213-2317,

(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213231724003537)

Abstract: Background

Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have poor 5-year survival. Pharmacological ascorbate (P-AscH-, high dose, intravenous, vitamin C) has shown promise as an adjunct to chemotherapy. We hypothesized adding P-AscH- to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel would increase survival in patients with metastatic PDAC.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with stage IV pancreatic cancer randomized 1:1 to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel only (SOC, control) or to SOC with concomitant P-AscH−, 75 g three times weekly (ASC, investigational). The primary outcome was overall survival with secondary objectives of determining progression-free survival and adverse event incidence. Quality of life and patient reported outcomes for common oncologic symptoms were captured as an exploratory objective. Thirty-six participants were randomized; of this 34 received their assigned study treatment. All analyses were based on data frozen on December 11, 2023.

Results

Intravenous P-AscH- increased serum ascorbate levels from micromolar to millimolar levels. P-AscH- added to the gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (ASC) increased overall survival to 16 months compared to 8.3 months with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (SOC) (HR = 0.46; 90 % CI 0.23, 0.92; p = 0.030). Median progression free survival was 6.2 (ASC) vs. 3.9 months (SOC) (HR = 0.43; 90 % CI 0.20, 0.92; p = 0.029). Adding P-AscH- did not negatively impact quality of life or increase the frequency or severity of adverse events.

Conclusions

P-AscH− infusions of 75 g three times weekly in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer prolongs overall and progression free survival without detriment to quality of life or added toxicity (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02905578).

Keywords: Pancreatic neoplasms; Ascorbic acid; Controlled clinical trial; Gemcitabine; Nab-paclitaxel

Dr. Cullen mentions that patients contact him not infrequently to ask if taking high-dose oral Vitamin C will help them achieve similar results. Unfortunately, it will not. Giving it intravenously facilitates giving much higher doses. The study had a relatively small number of participants, which limited ascertainment of quality of life.

On the psychological side, there are ways to bolster the mental health challenges of those with pancreatic cancer, which typically has a grim outcome in terms of survival:

Spiegel D. Mind matters in cancer survival. Psychooncology. 2012 Jun;21(6):588-93. doi: 10.1002/pon.3067. Epub 2012 Mar 21. PMID: 22438289; PMCID: PMC3370072.

Further, Dr. William Breitbart, MD, Chair of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center was interviewed in 2021 and emphasized the need for bolstering mental health for those diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. According to Breitbart, “Pancreatic cancer triggers an inflammatory response in the body, which can lead to mood disorders,” Breitbart explains. Psychiatrists can prescribe certain antidepressant medications that directly target that inflammatory response.”

The Zamboni Effect

I was walking around the mall today doing ordinary old guy things: watching the Zamboni machine resurface the ice rink, which I’ve never seen before, by the way. The surface was pretty dull before the Zamboni team started. There were two kids in the seat, one young lady driving and the other young man pointing out spots she missed. They went around and around getting the thin layer of water on the whole rink while eager skaters waited to get out there. They rejuvenated the rink, got it shining like crystal and skaters spun, twirled, and had a great time. It was the Zamboni Effect.

After that, I got up and did my usual thing, looked at books in Barnes & Noble, got a bite to eat, wondered why the mall security guy was walking by the bench so often where I was sitting. After his third pass, I got up and did my best to look like a solid citizen who is aware that loitering might look sinister to some mall security guys.

And when I wandered back to the tables next to the ice rink, I sat down again because the mall security guy was nowhere in sight. While I was just zoning out watching people pass by, one of them stopped and made a funny face at me. For a half-second, he didn’t register in my memory and then he called me by name. I suddenly recognized him as a former resident in the Medical-Psychiatry training program at University of Iowa Health Care (UIHC). It was Ravneet, one of the best trainees I have ever had the pleasure to work with.

It was kind of a shock. He had left for a great position with a health care organization out in Arizona many years ago and is very successful. He and his wife and daughter were on vacation and were walking through the mall. His son is also a high-level performer in science but he was not with them today. Ravneet takes time out every so often to travel like that. I’m sure it helps rejuvenate him—kind of like how the Zamboni machine rejuvenates the ice rink–the Zamboni Effect.

We exchanged pleasantries, he took a selfie with me, and I forgot to ask him to send me a copy, probably because I was so flabbergasted at running into him at the mall. It really brightened my day. Again—the Zamboni Effect. I really felt rejuvenated.

Every now and then, we all need the Zamboni Effect. Maybe it could even help the mall security guy.

Iowa Bills to Ban Vaccines and Require Vaccine Manufacturers to Waive Immunity Die

This week was what the Iowa Legislature calls funnel week. Today determined what bills stay alive and which one die.

The bills opposing vaccines died for this legislative session:

mRNA vaccines: Senate File 360 proposed a ban on health care providers administering gene-based vaccines, like the COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna. Under the proposal, health care providers who administered vaccines that use nucleic acids like messenger RNA (mRNA) would face punishments of a misdemeanor charge and a fine of $500 for each violation.”

Vaccine manufacturer immunity: House File 712 proposed requiring vaccine manufacturers waive their immunity from lawsuits over injuries that result from a “design defect” in a vaccine in order to distribute or administer the vaccine in Iowa. Under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, there is a National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program providing no-fault compensation to individuals and families injured by childhood vaccines. While supporters of the bill said the current compensation program has problems, medical practitioners and advocates said allowing for lawsuits to be filed against manufacturers would prevent vaccines from being available in Iowa.”

Story published in Iowa Capital Dispatch, “Funnel week 2025: What bills are alive, dead at Iowa Statehouse after first deadline” by Robin Opsahl. March 7, 2025.

What Does “Design Defect” of a Vaccine Mean In the Iowa Bill to Require Vaccine Manufacturers to Waive Immunity from Lawsuits?

Beats me. Sorry, just kidding. I’m just a little bleary from looking at the web sites about the definition of “design defect” related to vaccines as it applies to the Iowa bill to make vaccine manufacturers waive their immunity from lawsuits about vaccine related injuries.

I am sympathetic to anyone who in fact has suffered a vaccine related injury.

That term “design defect” has been bugging me for days now and I just found out that this has been the subject of states vs federal legal wrangling for years. I’m not up to explaining all the legalese but there is a really tangled trail of cases in Georgia and Pennsylvania roughly around 15 years ago that ultimately led to a U.S. Supreme Court decision saying, essentially, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and the federal Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of the 1980s preempts all state level vaccine design defect claims.

I think that explains why the Iowa bill says that vaccine manufacturers have to waive their immunity from suits if they want Iowans to get their vaccines.

I can hear the groans and shouts of dissent even as I write this. Hey, you can’t make this up. Talk to your legislator or lawyer about it.

I’m not sure why Iowa would want to repeat the grind that Georgia and Pennsylvania went through which led to the conclusion that you can file vaccine design defect claims at the state level and not have to repeat history which would likely lead to any decisions made there being reversed in federal court.

And I’m not sure why any vaccine manufacturer would want to fight that battle in Iowa either. They might just steer around us and take their vaccines elsewhere.

The beginning of the Georgia story.

The end of the Georgia story.

The beginning and the end of the Pennsylvania story.

Vaccines aren’t perfect. They are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. However, I support having vaccines available to help keep us healthy and the right to choose getting a vaccine. That’s why I don’t support a bill that I believe would make them less accessible.

New Wrinkle on Iowa Bill to Oppose mRNA Vaccines in Iowa

This is a follow up to yesterday’s post about the Iowa legislature’s proposition of a new law that would essentially ban mRNA vaccines in Iowa. I don’t understand the numbers and codes on the new sections, but the new one proposes that manufacturers of vaccines would have to waive immunity from lawsuits arising from “a design defect of the vaccine.”

I’m not sure if that’s addition to being charged with a simple misdemeanor, subject to a $500 fine for administering the vaccine. I oppose this one too because I think it would essentially make vaccines difficult to access and harder to persuade new medical staff to come to Iowa.

There’s going to be a meeting about the bill at 4:30 PM CST. I can’t remember if it’s at the state house or at the Exile Brewing Co. for sandwiches and Ruthie’s beer.

In any case, the comment section is overwhelmingly in opposition to the bill. I saw several comments mentioning that we already have the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVIP), which is designed to field requests for compensation to those who believe they’ve been injured by certain vaccines. I had not heard of it before. It’s administered by the federal government, Health Resources & Services Administration, which is under the Health and Human Resources department.

There is a nice easy to read summary about the complicated story of vaccine safety and liability at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia website. It was reviewed by Dr. Paul A. Offit, MD last year. He attends meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, although I think he missed the one last month about the flu vaccine because it was cancelled.

If I see anything earth shaking about the meeting this afternoon on HF712, I’ll make an addendum to this post.

Proposed Bill Would Ban mRNA Vaccines in Iowa

Sena just alerted me to a bill in the Iowa legislature right now that proposes mRNA vaccines (like the Covid vaccine for example) be banned in Iowa. Part of it says that any person who provides or administers such a vaccine would be guilty of a simple misdemeanor and subject to a $500 fine. I do not support it although I also support the right of others to disagree.

The bill advanced out of subcommittee yesterday and I’m not sure how although, admittedly, I don’t know what exactly that means about its chance of being ultimately passed into law. There were hundreds of comments against it. It moves for further consideration to the Iowa Senate Health and Human Services Committee according to a story in the Daily Iowan.

This sent me to the web to find out what other silly laws Iowa has passed. A few of them are below:

“Any person who attempts to pass off margarine, oleo, or oleomargarine as real butter is guilty of a simple misdemeanor in Iowa. This one originated in 1943, but is still in force today.”

“In Marshalltown, horses are forbidden to eat fire hydrants.”

“It is illegal for a mustached man to kiss a woman in public.”

All of the above are on this Iowa State University web page.

More on the Focused Practice Designation in Emergency Psychiatry

This post just provides further information (in addition to what was in yesterday’s post) on the evolution of the Focused Practice Designation (FPD) for consultation-liaison psychiatrists who might be interested in certifying to work in emergency departments. I use the word “certifying” because it seems clear that the FPD pathway has been intended to follow the board certification pathway, which I wondered about.

There’s a little background on the progress to the FPD path (established by ABMS in 2017) that began a few years ago in the article below:

Simpson S, Brooks V, DeMoss D, Lawrence R. The Case for Fellowship Training in Emergency Psychiatry. MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Nov 11;9:252. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000252.1. PMID: 38058898; PMCID: PMC10697437.

The take home message is quoted below:

“-Over 10 million emergency department encounters a year in the United States are for behavioral health concerns, but quality emergency psychiatric care remains inconsistently available.

-New emergency psychiatry fellowship programs are being developed to train expert clinicians and prepare leaders in the subspecialty.

-These efforts will improve access to high quality mental health treatment for all patients regardless of treatment setting.”

And there is a 55-page form on the web from the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) Committee on Certification (COCERT). There are several endorsements from various stakeholders including but not limited to the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (ACLP) and the American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology (ABPN) which make it clear there is a consensus about the value of “board certification” because most of the endorsement letters specify that. These letters are dated from just last year.

The University of Iowa Health Care system, based on the website does not (yet) offer an emergency psychiatry fellowship. They do offer a consultation-liaison psychiatry fellowship, which the ABMS supports as contributing to the attainment of the FPD credential.

However, I’m unclear if the FPD pathway won’t soon become yet another ongoing certification challenge for clinicians, many of whom find it more of an interference to their practice than a benefit. Although I believe that appropriately trained psychiatrists are helpful in the emergency room (after all, I did that for a long time), I have a nagging doubt that it will unclog the overcrowding there. Dr. George Dawson pointed that out yesterday in his comment to my post.

In the Purpose, Status, and Need section of the ABMS 55-page application form, starting on p.2 of the pdf, the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) specifies that the PFD would not be yet another subspecialty. The proposed 12-month fellowship in Emergency Behavioral Health (EBH) “…would not be ACGME-accredited training…” which distinguishes it from a subspecialty—yet they would be “recognized” for having the FPD.

Further, the application asserts that the EBH would “…address the mental health crisis in the US.” The reference to the “moral injury” that our colleagues suffer in the emergency room is not lost on me. I believe in the all for one and one for all concept. However, I’m less confident that this would lead to fewer patients boarding in emergency rooms. These days, entire hospitals often have no or too few beds available for either psychiatric or non-psychiatric patients.

Under the “Eligibility and Assessment” section, the emergency room psychiatrist seeking FPD status must hold ABEM or ABPN primary psychiatry certification. They would also be required to meet continuing certification requirements in EBH to maintain active FPD status. There is presently a “Practice Pathway” to the FPD, but that would eventually close. After that, the psychiatrist would need to complete a 12-month ABEM-approved EBH fellowship. The cycle length for the FPD in EBH would be 5 years, beyond which the applicant would be subject to re-verification of ongoing EBH practice experience “…to meet continuing certification requirements.”

You can learn more about FPD (including frequently asked questions) at this ABMS web site.

It sounds like board mandated MOC to me, and I don’t know how many clinicians will choose that route. It could discourage some psychiatrists from pursuing the FPD pathway. I’m also unsure how this will address the practical issue of emergency room boarding of patients with psychiatric illness, since doctors ultimately don’t control hospital bed capacity.

Girl Scout Cookies Are Safe!

We were out the other day and tried the new Girl Scout Thin Mint Frosties. Sena got chocolate and I got vanilla. We thought they were delicious. Wendy’s partnered with Girl Scouts of the USA to serve them up and it’s a great idea. They’re swirled and topped with a mint-flavored cookie crumble sauce.

We heard that the Girl Scouts would be out selling their famous cookies the same day at booths outside different stores across Iowa including Iowa City, but we couldn’t find them that day. Maybe it was because it was a little cold to be standing outside in a booth. Interestingly today, the girl scout didn’t know this whole idea was a collaboration between Wendy’s and the Girl Scouts of America.

We finally found a website that posted a schedule of when and where the cookies would be selling.

The weird thing is just before Sena left to get some Thin Mints cookies, we found a news story on the web which raised an alarm about whether or not they are poisonous (they’re not), if you can imagine that. People have been buying Girl Scout cookies for years and I’ve never heard of any problems.

So, it occurred to me that even though we’re not employees of the federal government, we could find 5 things to say relevant to the Department of Gustatory Explorations (DOGE) as part of our frivolous investigation of this issue. I think I’ve got that department name right.

  1. It turns out there’s a group called Moms Across America which has partnered with an outfit called GMOScience and they’re calling out Girls Scout of America for selling cookies with “toxic” metals and glyphosate (an herbicide). In their own small, unpublished, non-peer reviewed study, they tested some cookies and found they all had some traces of these substances. They tested cookies including Thin Mints in 3 states which included Iowa.
  2. Snopes investigated and found a number of facts, one of which is that “a child would have to eat 9,000 cookies in a day to approach harmful levels of pesticide or naturally occurring metals.”
  3. The FDA says you can safely eat the Thin Mints and any of the other kinds of Girl Scout cookies. On the other hand, I will not eat cookies containing coconut because it has the consistency of little pieces of cellophane, which I would chew endlessly without ever being able to bring myself to swallow them. This is a personal idiosyncrasy that has nothing intrinsically to do with any food containing coconut.
  4. Don Huber is a retired Purdue University professor of plant pathology who is part of the anti-GMO movement. He’s made many claims which have been criticized and refuted, even by Purdue University faculty members. One of them is that glyphosate causes a number of diseases including Alzheimer’s disease and he claims his ideas are supported by the research of a Maharishi movement expert in yogic flying. By the way there is a Maharishi International University (MIU) located in Fairfield, Iowa. You can learn transcendental meditation there and read about yogic flying (more like hopping) in an interesting 2016 NPR article but you won’t find anything in the curriculum per se on their website about levitation (but you will if you search for the term “yogic flying”). Consequently, you won’t learn dad jokes about this, including but not limited to “Help, I’ve levitated and I can’t get down!”
  5. The Girl Scout cookies and the Frosties taste great.

Well, I think that about wraps it up for DOGE.