Category: humor

Sena and I have been playing cribbage for a number of years but only recently have we begun to question the “Go rule.” I’ve looked on the web for clarification about how to use the Go, and found conflicting guidance. Incidentally, we’ve posted YouTube videos of some of our games, many of them probably showing we had an imperfect understanding of the Go rule. It occurs to me that if I had not turned off the comment section on these YouTube videos, I might have been alerted to what we’d probably been doing wrong over the years. But then I’d have had to deal with many inappropriate comments.

We have gradually realized that our use of the Go has probably been flawed, raising a couple of questions:

Do you score the one point for Go automatically just because your opponent says “Go” when she/he can’t play any cards without going over 31?

What do you do about the double Go sequence when neither of you can play without going over 31?

I looked for answers on the web.

One thing I’ll say is that the automatic pop-up Artificial Intelligence (AI) guidance is wrong. For example, AI says that the player who says “Go” gets the point for Go, which is clearly incorrect.

I also looked this up on the American Cribbage Congress (ACC) website and still couldn’t understand it. Then I found a couple of websites that seemed helpful. It’s notable that both were question/answer threads that went on for years about this one issue with the Go rule. Apparently, a lot of people don’t understand it, so I didn’t feel so bad.

The first site was a Cribbage Corner thread. At the beginning, it gave several helpful examples of the right way to use the Go rule—but then followed years of comments back and forth about it that eventually became difficult to follow. There was a question about the Stink Hole which, suffice it to say, triggered an annoyed reply which advised the questioner to quit using “kitchen table cribbage” rules.

The second one was a Stack Exchange thread. When I looked at it, it started with a question a player had in which he and his friend argued about the Go, and his friend (as it turned out) seemed to be on the right track:

“His rationale, is that when scoring 31, you are getting one point for hitting 31 exactly and 1 bonus point representing your partners’ inability to play an additional card (his “go”). He says “whether a “go” is said or not, the go is implied when you place the last card at the end of the round to make 31….thus giving you two points when you reach 31 even when a “go” is communicated”.”

The thread overall was more helpful and one commenter cited the ACC rule section (to which there’s a link), which clarified the question about reaching 31 which gives the player 2 points. The two points means: one point for the Go and one bonus point for getting the special score of 31.

There was also some clarification about the double Go, which is that if neither player can play a card that won’t take the total count over 31, neither player gets the 1 point for Go.

That has happened to us. I think this is right: If player A is the first to say “Go” and player B also says “Go,” then the count resets to zero and player A leads to the new sequence. If that’s wrong, don’t hesitate to tell me in the comment section—which I assure you will not extend for years going forward.

Update: See my update on this Go issue in the post “Update on the Cribbage Go Rule”, post dated January 23, 2025. Actually, this rule is clarified at this link.