Looking Back in My 6th Year of Retirement from Psychiatry: A Reblog and More

This is partly a reblog of my post in 2022, “Overdiagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders Still Happens” and partly a shout-out to my colleague and friend, Dr. George Dawson, MD on his recent post “The Politics of Deprescribing: Deconstructing the HHS Mental Health Agenda.”

I’m also looking back on another one of my posts with a similar title, “Looking Back on Gunslingers and Chess Masters.”

The longer my retirement lasts, the harder I think about the way I did my job as a consultation-liaison psychiatrist. It’s a little (emphasis on the word “little”) easier for me to look at my clinical decisions as well as my relationships with my colleagues, trainees, and patients and think about how I might have done things differently.

The word “regret” is misleading, because I did many things right. But I also made mistakes. Every psychiatrist makes diagnoses and treatment plans that can and should be reconsidered after careful thought as new information is discovered by scientists.

The emphasis is on the word “science.” Politicians and laypersons tend to misunderstand science, and sometimes even scientists get it wrong. I believe that science is often either ignored or politicized and that’s a common mistake.

As a clinician, I was always more of a gunslinger, but I always respected the science. So does Dr. Dawson and so do many other clinicians in medicine. Politicians often get it wrong. Usually, physicians as well as other clinicians, in the face of those mistakes, remain dedicated to upholding the principles of safe, practical, and effective health care. Often, in the face of the flying storms of misguided rhetoric, it’s still possible to do the right thing.

2 responses to “Looking Back in My 6th Year of Retirement from Psychiatry: A Reblog and More”

  1. Thanks for the shoutout! I was just thinking about this problem last night as I heard about the problem of “aging in place” rather than going to a nursing home when you are elderly. It was a public radio story and it seemed to emphasize a health system plan to do it. We have known since day 1 of my career how to do this – from the clinical and scientific perspective. When I started out – I could do public health nursing referrals and the patient would be seen and well cared for at home. With time that service was eliminated and suddenly the patient or their family was supposed to provide that care. It clearly does not work well – but there has not been any self correction. I have seen this deterioration at all levels of medicine despite advances in science. These days – everybody has an MRI scanner or two – but nobody gets a public health nurse.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Me

I’m Jim Amos MD, the creator and author behind this blog. I’m a retired psychiatrist who enjoys playing cribbage, juggling and still loves life-long learning. Watch out; I’m gonna pull your leg! Check out my YouTube site

Contact Form below:

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨