Focused Practice Designation – Go Retire Psychiatrist

This post just provides further information (in addition to what was in yesterday’s post) on the evolution of the Focused Practice Designation (FPD) for consultation-liaison psychiatrists who might be interested in certifying to work in emergency departments. I use the word “certifying” because it seems clear that the FPD pathway has been intended to follow the board certification pathway, which I wondered about.

There’s a little background on the progress to the FPD path (established by ABMS in 2017) that began a few years ago in the article below:

Simpson S, Brooks V, DeMoss D, Lawrence R. The Case for Fellowship Training in Emergency Psychiatry. MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Nov 11;9:252. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000252.1. PMID: 38058898; PMCID: PMC10697437.

The take home message is quoted below:

“-Over 10 million emergency department encounters a year in the United States are for behavioral health concerns, but quality emergency psychiatric care remains inconsistently available.

-New emergency psychiatry fellowship programs are being developed to train expert clinicians and prepare leaders in the subspecialty.

-These efforts will improve access to high quality mental health treatment for all patients regardless of treatment setting.”

And there is a 55-page form on the web from the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) Committee on Certification (COCERT). There are several endorsements from various stakeholders including but not limited to the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (ACLP) and the American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology (ABPN) which make it clear there is a consensus about the value of “board certification” because most of the endorsement letters specify that. These letters are dated from just last year.

The University of Iowa Health Care system, based on the website does not (yet) offer an emergency psychiatry fellowship. They do offer a consultation-liaison psychiatry fellowship, which the ABMS supports as contributing to the attainment of the FPD credential.

However, I’m unclear if the FPD pathway won’t soon become yet another ongoing certification challenge for clinicians, many of whom find it more of an interference to their practice than a benefit. Although I believe that appropriately trained psychiatrists are helpful in the emergency room (after all, I did that for a long time), I have a nagging doubt that it will unclog the overcrowding there. Dr. George Dawson pointed that out yesterday in his comment to my post.

In the Purpose, Status, and Need section of the ABMS 55-page application form, starting on p.2 of the pdf, the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) specifies that the PFD would not be yet another subspecialty. The proposed 12-month fellowship in Emergency Behavioral Health (EBH) “…would not be ACGME-accredited training…” which distinguishes it from a subspecialty—yet they would be “recognized” for having the FPD.

Further, the application asserts that the EBH would “…address the mental health crisis in the US.” The reference to the “moral injury” that our colleagues suffer in the emergency room is not lost on me. I believe in the all for one and one for all concept. However, I’m less confident that this would lead to fewer patients boarding in emergency rooms. These days, entire hospitals often have no or too few beds available for either psychiatric or non-psychiatric patients.

Under the “Eligibility and Assessment” section, the emergency room psychiatrist seeking FPD status must hold ABEM or ABPN primary psychiatry certification. They would also be required to meet continuing certification requirements in EBH to maintain active FPD status. There is presently a “Practice Pathway” to the FPD, but that would eventually close. After that, the psychiatrist would need to complete a 12-month ABEM-approved EBH fellowship. The cycle length for the FPD in EBH would be 5 years, beyond which the applicant would be subject to re-verification of ongoing EBH practice experience “…to meet continuing certification requirements.”

You can learn more about FPD (including frequently asked questions) at this ABMS web site.

It sounds like board mandated MOC to me, and I don’t know how many clinicians will choose that route. It could discourage some psychiatrists from pursuing the FPD pathway. I’m also unsure how this will address the practical issue of emergency room boarding of patients with psychiatric illness, since doctors ultimately don’t control hospital bed capacity.

I just found out about the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) announcement of a new addition to the Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry subspecialty: Focused Practice Designation. It looks like it’s going to be administered by the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM), possibly in collaboration with the American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology (ABPN).

I’m unsure of the nuts and bolts, but on the surface, it looks like it might be a promising way to address meeting the needs of the many patients who appear in hospital emergency rooms.

On the other hand, I’m unclear on whether this might also lead to the addition of yet another layer of medical and psychiatry board maintenance of certification exams and fees. It looks like some boards of medicine and surgery require those who want to pursue the Focused Practice Designation (FPD) specialization route sit for an initial certification exam which would be time-limited followed by something called “continuous certification” which is a form of maintenance of certification (MOC). This often entails periodic exams and fees which many physicians find burdensome and expensive, leading to petitions opposing MOC and finding alternatives to fulfill the continuing education needs in less costly and time-consuming ways. One notable alternative is the National Board of Physicians and Surgeons (NBAS).

I’m not sure why another layer of bureaucracy needs to be added to achieve the goal of ensuring that emergency room patients with mental health challenges have access to mental health professionals. In fact, there is an American Association for Emergency Psychiatry open to membership which includes psychiatrists, physician assistants, psychologists, nurses, social workers and other professionals. However, the goal behind the FPD route is to increase the presence of physicians in the emergency room. This creates a specific and arguably needed role for consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrists.

I get the impression the exact way this will be rolled out is under construction, so to speak. Although I can’t find language in the announcements for the new FPD specifically saying that there’s going to be another MOC for C-L psychiatrists, there doesn’t seem to be any language assuring there won’t be. The FPD web page for the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG) makes it pretty clear—there’s a MOC for that.

Just because you don’t see anything currently on the ABEM and ABPN web sites about MOC being required for the FPD doesn’t mean that it won’t appear in the near future. For now, the ABMS table outlining the differences between the certification requirements for specialty/subspecialty designation and the FDP doesn’t specify extra certification for the FDP for C-L psychiatrists per se.

I’m hoping for the best for patients and doctors.