Pursuant to my previous post about the debate in the Iowa Legislature over a proposed bill to make Ivermectin available over-the-counter (OTC) in Iowa, it looks as though hydroxychloroquine was recently dropped from the bill. Although few people say it out loud, in my opinion, it’s no secret that the main reason for the bill is to make ivermectin available to those who want to use it to treat Covid-19, despite there being no convincing evidence that it’s effective for that.
However, yet another bill was introduced by the governor which has its own ivermectin promotion section; so, there are now two ivermectin bills. They look the same.
The Iowa Board of Pharmacy is opposed to them because the language obliges them to comply with dispensing ivermectin to patients even if it might potentially harm them.
Although the bill removes penalties for dispensing ivermectin, there seem to be no specific penalties to pharmacists for refusing to do so. About 3 years ago, a pharmacist refused to fill a prescription for ivermectin that was intended for treatment of Covid-19.
A similar bill in Utah was not passed about 4 days ago. Supporters of the bill appeared to be engaging in passing misinformation about ivermectin for Covid-19, claiming there was “plenty of data” supporting its effectiveness for it. In fact, the FDA has not approved its use for treatment of Covid-19.
I wonder if there might be a justification for a kind of civil disobedience by pharmacists by refusing to give OTC ivermectin to patients. The other question is what does the Iowa Board of Medicine think about this? Is it right to leave physicians out of the loop in this situation?
It seems ironic that a legislator who is an internist, Dr. Austin Baeth, is on the right side of this debate by opposing the bills, yet the state medical board seems to be silent. Would it be appropriate for the state medical board to take a public position about this issue as the pharmacy board has?
Go Retire Psychiatrist 